Battling Stigma for Service Engagement among Women with HIV in Vietnam

Abstract:Women living with HIV/AIDS (WLHA) bear a higher level of stigma because of their socio-cultural vulnerabilities. Women are more likely to internalize social stigma and produce a sense of shame and loss of self-worth, which results in a delay in health service seeking and compromised health outcomes. In Vietnam, stigma towards WLHA is exacerbated by the deeply rooted female inferiority culture. However, research targeting WLHA is generally lacking. We propose this study to address stigma among WLHA and explore the use of virtual support system in WLHA’s service engagement in Vietnam. The 2-year study will proceed in two phases in Hanoi, Vietnam. Phase 1 will be formative studies, including in-depth interviews with 30 WLHA and focus groups with 20 service providers and community stakeholders. This phase aims to investigate the cultural and contextual background of HIV and gender roles in Vietnam and to identify effective strategies to support and engage WLHA in healthcare. These formative findings will inform the development of an intervention to be pilot tested in the next phase. Phase 2 will be a 6-month intervention pilot with 90 WLHA using an online/offline hybrid approach. During Month 1 of the pilot, WLHA will participate in an in-person section to form mutual support groups and prepare for the following online components. During Month 2-4 of the pilot, study investigators will teach WLHA a series of empowerment strategies to cope with stigma and utilize social support to seek healthcare services. These skills will be taught via interactive online group activities. During Month 4-6, WLHA will self-administer the online groups without the intervention of study investigators. WLHA’s multidimensional stigma measures, mental health burdens, and service use self- efficacy will be assessed at baseline, month 4, and month 6. Progress data of the intervention will be documented to inform the feasibility and sustainability of the online support approach. Acceptability data and feedback will be collected from the WLHA participants upon completion of the 6-month pilot period.

Project Number: 1R21TW012018-01

https://reporter.nih.gov/search/9c5dRBJyvkGOpSB3l9HRSw/project-details/10302007

 

Contact PI/ Project Leader

LIN, CHUNQING,  (lincq@ucla.edu)

 

Organization

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES

 

PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: HIV stigma and discrimination have enormous negative impacts on women, and reducing internalized stigma has significant implications for the effort to engage women in HIV prevention and care. This proposed study will devise strategies to empower women living with HIV in Vietnam to combat HIV and gender intersectional stigma. This study will lead to implementable and scalable approaches to promote women living with HIV’s mental health and service seeking not only in Vietnam but also globally.

 

 

Project Start Date: 17-September-2021

Project End Date: 31-May-2023

Budget Start Date: 17-September-2021

Budget End Date: 31-May-2022

 

NIH Categorical Spending

Funding IC:  NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DRUG ABUSE + FOGARTY INTERNATIONAL CENTER / FY Total Cost by IC: $219,421

Resiliency Education to Reduce Depression Disparities

Abstract: Depression is the leading cause of adult disability and common among lesbian, gay, bisexual (LGB) adults. Primary care depression quality improvement (QI) programs can improve outcomes for minorities more significantly than for nonminorities, but they are seldom available in safety-net systems. We build on findings from Community Partners in Care (CPIC) and Building Resiliency and Increasing Community Hope (B-RICH). CPIC compared depression QI approaches across healthcare and social /community services in communities of color. CPIC included healthcare and “community-trusted” programs (e.g., homeless, faithbased) to work as a network to address depression, compared to individual-program technical assistance. In CPIC, both conditions improved mental wellness, mental health quality of life, and depression over 12 months. B-RICH, a randomized study, evaluated lay delivery of a seven-session, CBTinformed resiliency education class versus case management on patients’ depressive symptoms over three months, in unpublished but completed analyses. The proposed demonstration supplements the resiliency class with a mobile/interactive voice response case management tool to reinforce class content and depression care reminders (BRICH+).

 

Pilot Intervention to Empower HIV Clients as Prevention Advocates in Uganda

Abstract:  People living with HIV/AIDS (PLHA) have a critical role to play in HIV prevention, not only in the context of Prevention for Positives and Treatment as Prevention, but as powerful change agents for HIV protective behaviors among others. Our research suggests that as PLHA receive HIV treatment and restore their health and functioning, many are motivated to protect their loved ones and engage in prevention advocacy (i.e., to encourage friends and family to seek HIV testing and treatment, and to reduce risk behavior); however, the quality of this advocacy is hampered by challenges related to message content, style and timing of delivery, and selection of advocacy recipients. With effective advocacy training, mobilizing PLHA to be change agents within their social networks has the potential to be a “game changer” for HIV prevention, particularly in high prevalence settings such as Uganda, where virtually every family is touched by someone living with HIV. Drawing upon theoretical frameworks for network-based interventions, such as theories of social diffusion, cognitive consistency, and social influence, the proposed study will develop and pilot test “Game Changers”– an intervention that aims to empower and mobilize PLHA to be agents for HIV prevention and behavioral change in their social networks. In Phase 1, we will conduct separate focus groups of PLHA and members of their social networks (family and friends) to explore barriers to and facilitators of mobilizing clients to advocate for HIV prevention, perceptions on how advocacy can be most effective in motivating behavior change, and how to best structure the intervention and its content. In Phase 2 we will use findings from Phase 1, and draw from network-based intervention models to develop the structure and content of an intervention designed to help clients cope with stigma, manage their disease, live positively, and develop motivation and skills for HIV disclosure and prevention advocacy. In Phase 3 we will pilot the group intervention in a controlled trial of 96 clients, with 48 randomly assigned to receive the intervention and 48 to the wait-list control. Assessments will be administered to all participants at baseline and months 4, 8 and 12, after which the control group will receive the intervention. Surveys and social network assessments will examine intervention effects on protective behaviors of the participant (condom use, HIV treatment adherence), and diffusion of prevention messages across the network, as assessed by the content and extent of communication with network members about protective behaviors (condom use, partner concurrency/number of partners, HIV testing, engagement in HIV care, circumcision), HIV disclosure, and HIV stigma. Game Changers is innovative as it encompasses aspects of all major HIV prevention paradigms, targets advocacy to all network members rather than within and by specific risk groups, and uses social network data not only to evaluate effects but also strategically target advocacy. Findings will inform a larger R01 trial.

Project Number: 5R36MH111460-02

NIMH Project Accept

Project Accept is a Phase III randomized controlled trial of community mobilization, mobile testing, same-day results, and post-test support for HIV in in sub-Saharan Africa and Thailand. Thirty-four communities in Africa (South Africa, Tanzania, and Zimbabwe) and 14 communities in Thailand are randomized to receive either a community-based HIV voluntary counseling and testing (CBVCT) intervention plus standard clinic-based VCT (SVCT), or SVCT alone. The CBVCT intervention has three major strategies: (1) to make VCT more available in community settings; (2) to engage the community through outreach; and (3) to provide post-test support. These strategies are designed to change community norms and reduce risk for HIV infection among all community members, irrespective of whether they participated directly in the intervention.

Research Methods:  

  • Community Engagement
  • Baseline Behavioral Assessment
  • Community Matching
  • Qualitative Assessment
    • Community Mapping and Ethnography
    • In-Depth Interviews
  • CBVCT Communities
    • Community Mobilization
    • Easy Access to VCT
    • Post-Test Support Services
    • Quality Assurance
  • Control Communities
    • Clinic-Based VCT
    • Quality Assurance
  • Post-Intervention Assessment
    • Post-Intervention Biological Assessment
    • Post-Intervention Behavioral Assessment
  • Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

From the perspective of national AIDS control planners in hard-hit countries, evidence-based strategies that have maximum epidemic impact are critically needed. These planners need interventions that are sustainable and can be adapted to the context of their local cultures. This is the first randomized controlled Phase III trial to determine the efficacy of a behavioral/social science intervention with an HIV incidence endpoint in the developing world. Provided that we can document efficacy with regard to HIV incidence and incremental cost-effectiveness, we expect that resources for widespread implementation of community-based VCT will become available from USAID or the Global Fund. We have worked closely with representatives of national AIDS programs in the host countries to ensure that the intervention is sustainable even in countries with limited resources.

 

Assessing Sexual Social Networks of Black and Hispanic MSM/Ws in Los Angeles County

Nationally and locally Blacks and Latinos have the highest incidences of HIV/AIDS. When stratifying incidence by gender, Blacks and Latino women have higher rates of HIV infection compared to their White counterparts. A recent “mainstream” hypothesis for the rise in numbers among minority women is that Black and Latino men in concurrent secret sexual relationships with men and Black and Latina women are the “bridgers” of infection between the homosexual (MSM) community and the heterosexual community. Currently no scientific evidence of transmission trends supporting this hypothesis has been documented. Although inferences from surveys such as the Young Men’s Study have been proffered as proof, such studies do not show direct causation. Further, few scientific studies have analyzed the societal and cultural factors that could impact the decision of Black and Latino men to disclose their sexual practices or HIV seropositivity.

The research project involved a two phase mixed methods study (qualitative and quantitative) focusing on cultural, spiritual, racial and gender related factors that facilitate or impede the disclosure of Black and Latino men who have sex with men and women (MSM/W) of their sexual preference or HIV serostatus.

Phase 1 consisted of 9 focus groups with 4 participants each (n=36) and 12 focused interviews (n= 12). All interviewees completed a short survey after the focus group or interview. A racially concordant facilitator conducted each research session. Phase 2 utilized findings from Phase I to construct an ethnographic interview guide. Forty ethnographic interviews (10 African-American MSM/W, 10 Hispanic MSM/W and 20 of their adjacent or peripheral female sexual partners) were conducted.

Community Health Study

There have been few attempts to monitor the risk behaviors and HIV seroprevalence among the general population.

Understanding the HIV epidemic in Los Angeles requires establishing an integrated, multilevel surveillance system for HIV, sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), and the Hepatitis C virus (HCV). Information about sexual and substance use risk behaviors, HIV seroprevalence, and public knowledge, attitudes, and norms regarding HIV are needed for public health planning. A surveillance system will be required in order for Los Angeles to maintain funding for Ryan White and other federal and state funding sources. To begin to develop a method for mounting a comprehensive surveillance system, the City of Los Angeles is planning a study examining the acceptability of anonymous HIV testing and volunteering information about one’s risk behaviors in order to allow planning for HIV-related services.

Most studies of HIV seroprevalence and risk behaviors have been conducted with subgroups identified at high risk for HIV: young gay men, injecting drug users, homeless adolescents, or seriously mentally ill adults. There have been few attempts to monitor the risk behaviors and HIV seroprevalence among the general population (not necessarily from identified high-risk groups). Before any comprehensive surveillance system can be established, the ability to monitor HIV in community settings and among households in neighborhoods with high rates of AIDS cases must be established. To fill this gap, a two-phase project is being initiated by the city in order to assess the acceptability of HIV testing and reporting one’s risk behaviors when approached: 1) in a household survey; or 2) in a neighborhood setting such as a shopping mall, grocery center, theater, or church.

First, the acceptability of gathering HIV-related information from a household will be examined by conducting a supplement to the Los Angeles Health Survey that will be mounted this summer. An anonymous telephone interview will be conducted with random digit dialing of households within the City of Los Angeles. Randomly selected telephone numbers (n=100) will be surveyed on knowledge of transmission of HIV, attitudes and norms towards members of high-risk groups (e.g., gay men) and infected persons, and willingness to anonymously be tested for HIV. All responses will be recorded unlinked from telephone numbers selected by random digit dialing; therefore the identify of all respondents will be unknown and can never be traced. From gathering this information, the acceptability of a household approach as a method of gathering information about HIV-related information will be assessed.

Second, a community with a high rate of AIDS cases will be selected. In this neighborhood, local leaders will be consulted to identify a strategy for sampling community members anonymously and in settings accessible to all community members. In shopping malls in both communities, adults will be asked to anonymously volunteer to participate in a survey of attitudes and norms regarding HIV prevention activities, recent sexual and substance use risks acts, and consent to a saliva-based HIV test. The results of any individual test results will not be available; unmarked samples will be collected in order to indicate a community seroprevalence rate. Interested individuals will be offered an incentive for participating in the survey and test. The willingness of adult members of the community to participate in a study anonymously will be evaluated. Similar to the telephone household survey, no identity of any participant will be obtained. Overall, community rates will be obtained, but no individual information regarding risk or infection status.

The results of these two activities will be used to inform the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisor’s decisions regarding the best method for establishing surveillance methods for HIV infection and predictions regarding the future routes and subgroups for HIV infection. Currently, the County is considering adopting a method of practitioners informing public health officials of all persons testing seropositive for HIV or for a system of unique identifiers for persons who test seropositive for HIV. Both of these systems rely on the identification of seropositive persons, an event that typically occurs about 10 years after a person has become infected. Alternative strategies for monitoring the epidemic, especially among communities with an emerging epidemic must be identified. These studies will inform the strategy selected by the County and may become a national model.

Angola – Acceptability of Handheld Computers to Collect Self-reported Sexual Behavior Data in Angola

Acceptability of Handheld Computers to Collect Self-reported Sexual Behavior Data in Angola

This study evaluates the cultural acceptability and cost-effectiveness of using handheld computers to collect sexual behavior data, in order to reduce disparities in access to HIV/AIDS prevention and care services in Angola, a country severely impacted by HIV/AIDS. Specifically, this study aimed 1) to assess how comfortable Angolans feel in disclosing sexual behavior in handheld computer surveys compared to paper surveys, and 2) to assess how comfortable Angolan interviewers feel in administering handheld computer surveys vs. paper surveys.

Targeted Risk Group: 

Sexually active adults, 18-45

Intervention model: 

Randomized Control Trial

Research Methods: 

We conducted an experiment in three neighborhoods of Luanda, Angola to assess the impact of the technology on people’s comfort and willingness to disclose sensitive personal information, such as sexual behavior. Participants were asked about their HIV/AIDS-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices by local interviewers using either handheld computers or paper surveys. T-tests showed no differences between participants’ self-reported comfort across handheld and paper conditions. However, participants in the handheld condition were more likely to give socially desirable responses to the sexual behavior questions than participants in the paper condition.

International Significance: 

Handheld computers have potential to improve HIV/AIDS programs in healthcare settings in low-income countries, by improving the speed and accuracy of collecting data. However, the acceptability of the technology (i.e., user attitude and reaction) is critical for its successful implementation. Acceptability is particularly critical for HIV/AIDS behavioral data, as it depends on respondents giving accurate information about a highly sensitive topic – sexual behavior. These results suggest that using handheld computers in data collection in Angola may lead to biased reports of HIV/AIDS-related risk behaviors.

Feasibility and Acceptability of PrEP and Non-occupational Npep for HIV Prevention in Los Angeles

This is a qualitative study of knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and perceived barriers to implementation of biomedical prevention strategies among MSM in metropolitan Los Angeles, California. Three focus groups comprised of sixteen unique individual participants were conducted at the UCLA Center for Clinical AIDS Research and Education between April 2008 and June 2008. Additionally, five key informants were interviewed individually. Three interviews were performed face-to-face, and two were performed via telephone for participant convenience.

MSM in metropolitan Los Angeles were recruited via Craigslist (www.craigslist.com), newspaper/magazine advertising, and palm-card and flyer distribution at MSM-focused locations including bars, restaurants, dance clubs, and commercial sex venues. Twenty men responded to advertising and were scheduled for three focus group dates; 16 men presented for focus group participation. Key Informants were recruited on a first-responder basis from a master list of HIV providers and community based organization staff and activists who attend UCLA HIV-related symposia and events. Each participant (focus group and key informant) was compensated $20 for their time.

Interventions, Training Manuals, etc. :

Feasibility and Acceptability of PrEP and Non-occupational PEP for HIV Prevention - Final Study Report

Popular Opinion Leader HIV Intervention among Chinese Market Workers

This project is part of the NIMH Collaborative HIV/STD Prevention Trial which adopts a two-arm, randomized community-level design to test the Popular Opinion Leader (POL) HIV prevention intervention model at five international sites (China, India, Peru, Russia, and Zimbabwe). CCH is the lead on the China site.

China, representing 1/4th of the world’s population, has a rapidly emerging HIV epidemic with about 1.2 million individuals already infected, more than the total of all the Asian nations combined. Similar to Africa and India, the country’s 200-250 million labor migrants are a key to the epidemic’s future; however, HIV infection is predominantly occurring in rural settings (75% of population) and migrants transmit the virus heterosexually when moving to the cities annually.

The goals of this project are: 1) to adapt a comprehensive community-level preventive intervention – The Popular Opinion Leader – to populations in China based on data from ethnographic studies and compare the results with the other four international sites which follow the same research procedure; 2) to test the efficacy of this community-level preventive intervention in China as well as the four international sites utilizing both behavioral and biological outcomes; and, 3) to develop a manual that will permit different health care agencies and service providers to conduct rapid ethnographic studies, translate this community-level intervention to different settings and populations, and assess intervention efficacy.

The ability of CCH investigators to successfully implement the project is based on previous successful HIV prevention trials including interventions in China and participation in HIV-related cooperative agreements; support of the project from experienced Chinese collaborators, officials, and organizations; access to sites in China; collaboration with experienced Chinese investigators, several of whom have trained at UCLA; collaboration of the Qualitative Core of the UCLA-NPI with considerable cross-national and cross-site experience; and previous experience in conducting interventions and assessments that are culturally sensitive and appropriate.

China Stigma Project

China has 1 million Persons Living with HIV (PLH) and will have an anticipated 10 million PLH by the year 2010. With 1/5 of the world’s population (1.4 billion persons) in China, the risk of an epidemic is substantial. Recently, the Chinese government has recognized the substantial risk it faces in HIV and has allocated resources to fight HIV. Yet HIV-related stigma and discrimination continue to impede every step in mounting an effective response for prevention, treatment, and care in China.

The National Institute of Mental Health funds this 3-year project of HIV/AIDS-related stigma among health care providers in China. The specific aims of this project are: To document base rates of HIV related stigma among service providers and health administrators and its impact on health service behaviors and care for PLH; To identify socio-cultural, structural, and personal factors that are associated with HIV-related stigma towards PLH among service providers and health administrators; and To design, pilot test, and evaluate an intervention for service providers to address HIV-related stigma and its impact on health service delivery and adequate care.

A total of 105 participants have taken part in the in-depth qualitative interview in Phase I study. Among them 30 are PLH, 15 are family members of PLH, 33 are health care providers, and 27 are health care administrators. Approximately 1,000-1,400 health care providers are being recruited to participate in Phase II quantitative survey study. Using data collected from Phases I and II, the research team will design and pilot test an intervention aimed at reducing HIV/AIDS-related stigma among health care providers in China.

Geographical location:

Yunnan Province,China

Targeted group:

Service providers working at the provincial, city, county, township and village level medical facilities.

Intervention model:

Psych-education and planned behavioral change

 Research methods:

  • In-depth qualitative interviews with PLH, family member of PLH, service providers, and health administrators.
  • A survey of 1,001 service providers and health administrators
  • Intervention pilot with baseline, 3-month and 6-month follow-ups.

Published Journal Articles :

  1. [Download not found]
  2. [Download not found]
  3. [Download not found]
  4. [Download not found]
  5. [Download not found]
  6. [Download not found]
  7. [Download not found]
  8. [Download not found]
  9. [Download not found]
  10. [Download not found]
  11. [Download not found]
  12. [Download not found]
  13. [Download not found]
  14. [Download not found]
  15. [Download not found]